Here's ## #### on the #########
7 hours ago
Follow Constantly Furious on
Other Bloggers' Efforts
-
Well, Of Course We Will, Emma… - ...because judging each other is what social beings *do*. ...new research suggests *different social classes have stopped using different words* for the ...
-
Đội Tuyển Đức Euro 2024: Giấc Mơ Chinh Phục Ngôi Vô Địch Trên Sân Nhà - Sự quan tâm dành cho đội tuyển Đức tại Euro 2024 đang tăng cao không ngừng khi giải đấu đang đến gần. Nhiều người hâm mộ đang kỳ vọng vào một đội hình đầy ...5 months ago
-
Rage-Driven Tobacco Control Industry Stupidity Explained In One Tweet - It was once explained to me that there are thousands of students who start off aspiring to be doctors. Those not clever enough to become doctors drift in...
1 year ago -
Outta here… - As promised, I’ll no longer be updating this site. My new stuff will all be published at https://aljahom.substack.com Please do subscribe over there to get...2 years ago
-
NHS Fail Wail - I think that we can all agree that the UK's response to coronavirus has been somewhat lacking. In fact, many people asserted that our death rate was unique...4 years ago
Social networking nonsense
Seen the fury
Subscribe To
Posts
Comments
2 comments:
Yesterday you accused us all of flogging a dead horse....
today you are complaining about the redactions.
make your mind up.
this is either a live story or not.
which is it?
scott -
theres a difference between noting the censorship in the recent publications, and going on about - as many have been - yet more expenses revelations regarding what has been purchased with public money. personally, i'm less worried about MPs buying duck houses, and more worried about the government concealing what has and hasnt been claimed on. i think CF was referring to the constant drip-drip of '*unknown MP* has bought *household substance* with our money.' this is far less important at this stage than other political stories. however, thats not to say bloggers shouldnt note the censorship, which is new, unlike the news that MPs have used our money to buy things they shouldnt have.
Post a Comment